Security Public Relations Excuse Bingo
Via Bruce, who features himself. :)
I’m going to be naughty and paste all the items, otherwise you’d be there all day hitting refresh.
- You’re so negative
- Our proactive technology solutions prevent that
- Our proprietary encryption algorithms prevent that
- We have CISSP certified engineers
- That’s just theoretical mumbo-jumbo
- You’ll be hearing from our lawyers
- You’ve got a conflict of interest
- That’s only there for backward compatibility
- We meet all government standards
- We meet all industry standards
- It doesn’t need to be very secure
- Nothing is 100% secure
- We take security very seriously
- We don’t comment on security matters
- No comment
- You are in violation of the DMCA
- We already knew about it
- Nobody will ever try to do this
- What kind of a person looks for flaws?
- No one would ever think of that
- Our success speaks for itself
- You’re paranoid
- You’re just an academic
- You’re only helping the bad guys
- Why do you hate America?
- You don’t understand the context
- The product was tested by security experts
- We employ top security experts
- Who are you to criticize, anyway?
- This is probably fixed in the next release
- No one has complained before
- No one has ever found any problems
- It’s a feature our users want
- Let’s see you design something better
- You’re just looking for attention
- You must be being paid by our competition
- We’ve always done it this way
- Everybody does it this way
- We follow industry standard practices
- We think it is secure enough
- You’re being irresponsible
- If you hadn’t told anyone, it would still be secure
- La, la, la we’re not listening
- It’s secure enough for our customers
- We use crypto- graphy
- We read Schneier’s book
- What do you have against us?
- Why are you trying to harm our industry?
- It would be too expensive to fix that
- Our customers love our product
- We’re fully ISO-9001 compliant
- Nobody’s perfect